| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <op.0q3pw0stwjvjmi@mqcpg7oapc828.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:35:10 -0500
From: "Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Jethro Beekman" <jethro@...tanix.com>,
"Chunyang Hui" <sanqian.hcy@...fin.com>,
"Jordan Hand" <jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com>,
"Nathaniel McCallum" <npmccallum@...hat.com>,
"Seth Moore" <sethmo@...gle.com>,
"Darren Kenny" <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
"Sean Christopherson" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
"Suresh Siddha" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
asapek@...gle.com, bp@...en8.de, cedric.xing@...el.com,
chenalexchen@...gle.com, conradparker@...gle.com,
cyhanish@...gle.com, dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 13/24] x86/sgx: Add SGX_IOC_ENCLAVE_ADD_PAGES
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:02:06 -0500, Jarkko Sakkinen
<jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 12:34:18AM -0500, Haitao Huang wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 Sep 2020 06:05:11 -0500, Jarkko Sakkinen
>> <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
>> ...
>>
>> > +static int __sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl,
>> > + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page,
>> > + struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page,
>> > + struct sgx_secinfo *secinfo, unsigned long src)
>> > +{
>> > + struct sgx_pageinfo pginfo;
>> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma;
>> > + struct page *src_page;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + /* Query vma's VM_MAYEXEC as an indirect path_noexec() check. */
>> > + if (encl_page->vm_max_prot_bits & VM_EXEC) {
>> > + vma = find_vma(current->mm, src);
>> > + if (!vma)
>> > + return -EFAULT;
>> > +
>> > + if (!(vma->vm_flags & VM_MAYEXEC))
>> > + return -EACCES;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + ret = get_user_pages(src, 1, 0, &src_page, NULL);
>> > + if (ret < 1)
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > + pginfo.secs = (unsigned long)sgx_get_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page);
>> > + pginfo.addr = SGX_ENCL_PAGE_ADDR(encl_page);
>> > + pginfo.metadata = (unsigned long)secinfo;
>> > + pginfo.contents = (unsigned long)kmap_atomic(src_page);
>> > +
>> > + ret = __eadd(&pginfo, sgx_get_epc_addr(epc_page));
>> > +
>> > + kunmap_atomic((void *)pginfo.contents);
>> > + put_page(src_page);
>> > +
>> > + return ret ? -EIO : 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +/*
>> > + * If the caller requires measurement of the page as a proof for the
>> > content,
>> > + * use EEXTEND to add a measurement for 256 bytes of the page. Repeat
>> > this
>> > + * operation until the entire page is measured."
>> > + */
>> > +static int __sgx_encl_extend(struct sgx_encl *encl,
>> > + struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page)
>> > +{
>> > + int ret;
>> > + int i;
>> > +
>> > + for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
>> > + ret = __eextend(sgx_get_epc_addr(encl->secs.epc_page),
>> > + sgx_get_epc_addr(epc_page) + (i * 0x100));
>> > + if (ret) {
>> > + if (encls_failed(ret))
>> > + ENCLS_WARN(ret, "EEXTEND");
>> > + return -EIO;
>> > + }
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + return 0;
>> > +}
>> > +
>> > +static int sgx_encl_add_page(struct sgx_encl *encl, unsigned long
>> src,
>> > + unsigned long offset, struct sgx_secinfo *secinfo,
>> > + unsigned long flags)
>> > +{
>> > + struct sgx_encl_page *encl_page;
>> > + struct sgx_epc_page *epc_page;
>> > + int ret;
>> > +
>> > + encl_page = sgx_encl_page_alloc(encl, offset, secinfo->flags);
>> > + if (IS_ERR(encl_page))
>> > + return PTR_ERR(encl_page);
>> > +
>> > + epc_page = __sgx_alloc_epc_page();
>> > + if (IS_ERR(epc_page)) {
>> > + kfree(encl_page);
>> > + return PTR_ERR(epc_page);
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + mmap_read_lock(current->mm);
>> > + mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * Insert prior to EADD in case of OOM. EADD modifies MRENCLAVE,
>> i.e.
>> > + * can't be gracefully unwound, while failure on EADD/EXTEND is
>> limited
>> > + * to userspace errors (or kernel/hardware bugs).
>> > + */
>> > + ret = xa_insert(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(encl_page->desc),
>> > + encl_page, GFP_KERNEL);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + goto err_out_unlock;
>> > +
>> > + ret = __sgx_encl_add_page(encl, encl_page, epc_page, secinfo,
>> > + src);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + goto err_out;
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * Complete the "add" before doing the "extend" so that the "add"
>> > + * isn't in a half-baked state in the extremely unlikely scenario
>> > + * the enclave will be destroyed in response to EEXTEND failure.
>> > + */
>> > + encl_page->encl = encl;
>> > + encl_page->epc_page = epc_page;
>> > + encl->secs_child_cnt++;
>> > +
>> > + if (flags & SGX_PAGE_MEASURE) {
>> > + ret = __sgx_encl_extend(encl, epc_page);
>> > + if (ret)
>> > + goto err_out;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > + mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
>> > + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
>> > + return ret;
>> > +
>> > +err_out:
>> > + xa_erase(&encl->page_array, PFN_DOWN(encl_page->desc));
>> > +
>> > +err_out_unlock:
>> > + mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
>> > + mmap_read_unlock(current->mm);
>> > +
>> > + sgx_free_epc_page(epc_page);
>> > + kfree(encl_page);
>> > +
>> > + /*
>> > + * Destroy enclave on ENCLS failure as this means that EPC has been
>> > + * invalidated.
>> > + */
>> > + if (ret == -EIO) {
>> > + mutex_lock(&encl->lock);
>> > + sgx_encl_destroy(encl);
>> > + mutex_unlock(&encl->lock);
>> > + }
>> > +
>>
>> I think originally we return both count of succeeded EADDs and the
>> errors.
>> So we only destroy enclaves in cases of fatal ENCLS failures.
>>
>> Now we only return errors in all failures other than interrupted
>> operations
>> or SGX_MAX_ADD_PAGES_LENGTH is reached.
>>
>> So, for the new design we should destroy enclaves in all cases here, not
>> just for -EIO.
>>
>> On the other hand, I do like the old way returning both the count and
>> error
>> better. It helps greatly for debugging any issues in enclave image or
>> user
>> space code, and also keeps flexibility for user space to recover in
>> certain
>> errors, such as out of EPC.
>
> Right, I do get the OOM case but wouldn't in that case the reasonable
> thing to do destroy the enclave that is not even running? I mean that
> means that we are globally out of EPC.
>
I would say it could be a policy, but not the only one. If it does not
make much difference to kernel, IMHO we should not set it in stone now.
Debugging is also huge benefit to me.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists