linux-kernel - Re: slab-out-of-bounds in iov_iter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200917184558.GX3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 19:45:58 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
        miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slab-out-of-bounds in iov_iter_revert()

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:42:44PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > 
> > 	How much IO does it take to trigger that on your reproducer?
> 
> That is something I don't know for sure because it is always reproducible by
> running the trinity fuzzer for a few seconds (32 threads). I did another run
> below (still with your patch applied) and then tried to capture some logs here:
> 
> http://people.redhat.com/qcai/iov_iter_revert/

FWIW, there were several bugs in that patch:
	* 'shortened' possibly left uninitialized
	* possible error returns with reexpand not done

Could you try this instead?

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 6611ef3269a8..43c165e796da 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -3091,11 +3091,10 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	ssize_t ret = 0;
 	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
 	struct fuse_file *ff = file->private_data;
-	bool async_dio = ff->fc->async_dio;
 	loff_t pos = 0;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	loff_t i_size;
-	size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
+	size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter), shortened = 0;
 	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
 	struct fuse_io_priv *io;
 
@@ -3103,17 +3102,9 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	inode = file->f_mapping->host;
 	i_size = i_size_read(inode);
 
-	if ((iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) && (offset > i_size))
+	if ((iov_iter_rw(iter) == READ) && (offset >= i_size))
 		return 0;
 
-	/* optimization for short read */
-	if (async_dio && iov_iter_rw(iter) != WRITE && offset + count > i_size) {
-		if (offset >= i_size)
-			return 0;
-		iov_iter_truncate(iter, fuse_round_up(ff->fc, i_size - offset));
-		count = iov_iter_count(iter);
-	}
-
 	io = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_io_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (!io)
 		return -ENOMEM;
@@ -3129,15 +3120,22 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	 * By default, we want to optimize all I/Os with async request
 	 * submission to the client filesystem if supported.
 	 */
-	io->async = async_dio;
+	io->async = ff->fc->async_dio;
 	io->iocb = iocb;
 	io->blocking = is_sync_kiocb(iocb);
 
+	/* optimization for short read */
+	if (io->async && !io->write && offset + count > i_size) {
+		iov_iter_truncate(iter, fuse_round_up(ff->fc, i_size - offset));
+		shortened = count - iov_iter_count(iter);
+		count -= shortened;
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We cannot asynchronously extend the size of a file.
 	 * In such case the aio will behave exactly like sync io.
 	 */
-	if ((offset + count > i_size) && iov_iter_rw(iter) == WRITE)
+	if ((offset + count > i_size) && io->write)
 		io->blocking = true;
 
 	if (io->async && io->blocking) {
@@ -3155,6 +3153,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	} else {
 		ret = __fuse_direct_read(io, iter, &pos);
 	}
+	iov_iter_reexpand(iter, iov_iter_count(iter) + shortened);
 
 	if (io->async) {
 		bool blocking = io->blocking;