[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ace68d00-f005-fee3-1f01-44522c180462@nvidia.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:53:07 +0100
From: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
CC: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Sumit Garg" <sumit.garg@...aro.org>, <kernel-team@...roid.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
Saravana Kannan <saravanak@...gle.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"Gregory Clement" <gregory.clement@...tlin.com>,
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
"Linux Samsung SOC" <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Valentin Schneider <Valentin.Schneider@....com>,
linux-tegra <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/16] irqchip/gic: Configure SGIs as standard
interrupts
On 17/09/2020 09:54, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> On 17.09.2020 10:49, Jon Hunter wrote:
>> On 17/09/2020 09:45, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 2020-09-17 08:54, Jon Hunter wrote:
>>>> On 17/09/2020 08:50, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>>>> On 2020-09-17 08:40, Linus Walleij wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 5:11 PM Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Can you try the patch below and let me know?
>>>>>> I tried this patch and now Ux500 WORKS. So this patch is definitely
>>>>>> something you should apply.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - if (is_frankengic())
>>>>>>> - set_sgi_intid(irqstat);
>>>>>>> + this_cpu_write(sgi_intid, intid);
>>>>>> This needs changing to irqstat to compile as pointed out by Jon.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> With that:
>>>>>> Tested-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
>>>>> Thanks a lot for that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Still need to understand why some of Jon's systems are left unbootable,
>>>>> despite having similar GIC implementations (Tegra194 and Tegra210 use
>>>>> the same GIC-400, and yet only one of the two boots correctly...).
>>>> So far, I have only tested this patch on Tegra20. Let me try the other
>>>> failing boards this morning and see if those still fail.
>>> Tegra20 (if I remember well) is a dual A9 with the same GIC implementation
>>> as Ux500, hence requiring the source CPU bits to be written back. So this
>>> patch should have cured it, but didn't...
>>>
>>> /me puzzled.
>> Me too. Maybe there just happens to be something else also going wrong
>> in next. I am doing a bit more testing to see if applying the fix
>> directly on top of this change fixes it to try and eliminate anything
>> else in -next.
>>
>> Linus, what -next are you testing on? I am using next-20200916.
>
> next-20200916 completely broken on ARM and ARM64. Please check
> next-20200915 + the mentioned fix or just check
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/maz/arm-platforms.git/log/?h=irq/ipi-as-irq
OK, I have confirmed that on Tegra20 and Tegra30, that next-20200915 +
Marc's fix boots fine.
Tegra186 and Tegra194 are not booting, but I am wondering if this is yet
another issue that is not related. I have not actually bisected on these
boards, but I am now bisecting on Tegra186 to confirm.
Jon
--
nvpublic
Powered by blists - more mailing lists