linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: xattr: Fix some potential memory leaks while iterating entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAFLxGvxXE_jb7nGMn9XOzaFb6SELspQ2Dvdc7zs5i5G8XK3UfQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:47:46 +0200
From:   Richard Weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:     Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
        "zhangyi (F)" <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ubifs: xattr: Fix some potential memory leaks while
 iterating entries

On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 5:25 AM Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com> wrote:
> 在 2020/9/14 3:08, Richard Weinberger 写道:
> > On Mon, Jun 1, 2020 at 11:11 AM Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@...wei.com> wrote:
> The kill_xattrs process is more intuitive without the pxent. However,
> the release process for the memory (stores xent->name) is similar to
> 'pxent'. If you think it's better than v1, I will send v2.

You are right. We don't gain much. So I'll take v1.
Thanks a lot for fixing!

-- 
Thanks,
//richard