[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200917221858.GH7964@magnolia>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:18:58 -0700
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@...nel.org>,
jfs-discussion@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] iomap: Change calling convention for zeroing
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 11:11:15PM +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 03:05:00PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > -static loff_t
> > > -iomap_zero_range_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos, loff_t count,
> > > - void *data, struct iomap *iomap, struct iomap *srcmap)
> > > +static loff_t iomap_zero_range_actor(struct inode *inode, loff_t pos,
> > > + loff_t length, void *data, struct iomap *iomap,
> >
> > Any reason not to change @length and the return value to s64?
>
> Because it's an actor, passed to iomap_apply, so its types have to match.
> I can change that, but it'll be a separate patch series.
Ah, right. I seemingly forgot that. :(
Carry on.
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@...cle.com>
--D
Powered by blists - more mailing lists