[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5de6c6d3ced340ac80702c527bb38d12@huawei.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 06:21:13 +0000
From: linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
CC: "Gustavo A . R . Silva" <gustavo@...eddedor.com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
"linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org" <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com"
<clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfs: remove incorrect fallthrough label
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
> There is no case after the default from which to fallthrough to. Clang will error in this case (unhelpfully without context, see link below) and GCC will with -Wswitch-unreachable.
>
>The previous commit should have just replaced the comment with a break statement.
>
>If we consider implicit fallthrough to be a design mistake of C, then all case statements should be terminated with one of the following
>statements:
>* break
>* continue
>* return
>* __attribute__(__fallthrough__)
>* goto (plz no)
>* (call of function with __attribute__(__noreturn__))
>
>Fixes: 2a1390c95a69 ("nfs: Convert to use the preferred fallthrough macro")
>Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47539
>Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
>Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
>---
Reviewed-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists