[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200917070614.GP486552@unreal>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:06:14 +0300
From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
To: Wong Vee Khee <vee.khee.wong@...el.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ong Boon Leong <boon.leong.ong@...el.com>,
Voon Wei Feng <weifeng.voon@...el.com>,
Tan Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>,
Vijaya Balan Sadhishkhanna
<sadhishkhanna.vijaya.balan@...el.com>,
Seow Chen Yong <chen.yong.seow@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: introduce rtnl_lock|unlock() on
configuring real_num_rx|tx_queues
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 01:02:15PM +0800, Wong Vee Khee wrote:
> From: "Tan, Tee Min" <tee.min.tan@...el.com>
>
> For driver open(), rtnl_lock is acquired by network stack but not in the
> resume(). Therefore, we introduce lock_acquired boolean to control when
> to use rtnl_lock|unlock() within stmmac_hw_setup().
Doesn't really make sense, if function needs to have lock acquired, the
caller is supposed to take it and function should have proper lockdep
annotation inside and not this conditional lock/unlock.
Thanks
>
> Fixes: 686cff3d7022 ("net: stmmac: Fix incorrect location to set real_num_rx|tx_queues")
>
Extra line.
> Signed-off-by: Tan, Tee Min <tee.min.tan@...el.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c | 13 ++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> index df2c74bbfcff..22e6a3defa78 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> @@ -2607,7 +2607,8 @@ static void stmmac_safety_feat_configuration(struct stmmac_priv *priv)
> * 0 on success and an appropriate (-)ve integer as defined in errno.h
> * file on failure.
> */
> -static int stmmac_hw_setup(struct net_device *dev, bool init_ptp)
> +static int stmmac_hw_setup(struct net_device *dev, bool init_ptp,
> + bool lock_acquired)
> {
> struct stmmac_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
> u32 rx_cnt = priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use;
> @@ -2715,9 +2716,15 @@ static int stmmac_hw_setup(struct net_device *dev, bool init_ptp)
> }
>
> /* Configure real RX and TX queues */
> + if (!lock_acquired)
> + rtnl_lock();
> +
> netif_set_real_num_rx_queues(dev, priv->plat->rx_queues_to_use);
> netif_set_real_num_tx_queues(dev, priv->plat->tx_queues_to_use);
>
> + if (!lock_acquired)
> + rtnl_unlock();
> +
> /* Start the ball rolling... */
> stmmac_start_all_dma(priv);
>
> @@ -2804,7 +2811,7 @@ static int stmmac_open(struct net_device *dev)
> goto init_error;
> }
>
> - ret = stmmac_hw_setup(dev, true);
> + ret = stmmac_hw_setup(dev, true, true);
> if (ret < 0) {
> netdev_err(priv->dev, "%s: Hw setup failed\n", __func__);
> goto init_error;
> @@ -5238,7 +5245,7 @@ int stmmac_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> stmmac_clear_descriptors(priv);
>
> - stmmac_hw_setup(ndev, false);
> + stmmac_hw_setup(ndev, false, false);
> stmmac_init_coalesce(priv);
> stmmac_set_rx_mode(ndev);
>
> --
> 2.17.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists