[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200917081158.GA19903@OpenSuse>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 13:41:58 +0530
From: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: b.zolnierkie@...sung.com, linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
corbet@....net, rdunlap@...radead.org, daniel@...ll.ch,
yuanmingbuaa@...il.com, w@....eu, nopitydays@...il.com,
zhangyunhai@...ocus.com, luto@...capital.net,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: fb: Remove framebuffer scrollback boot option
On 09:47 Thu 17 Sep 2020, Greg KH wrote:
>On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 04:31:50AM +0530, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
>> This patch remove reference to this option in this document and
>> renumbered the sections. This is related to below commits.
>>
>> Commit 973c096f6a85(vgacon: remove software scrollback support)
>> Commit 50145474f6ef(fbcon: remove soft scrollback code)
>>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
>> ---
>> This version try to correct the previous errors, proper changelog text, subject
>> Trying to incorporate Willy's & Greg's suggestions
>
>Better, but...
>
>This should be a patch series, properly numbered and threaded, right?
>
>The text above still has the commit ids not properly referenced, and you
>have trailing whitespace in the text too.
>
I will certainly fix that in the upcoming version.
>Writing the changelog is often times the hardest part of a patch, as you
>are finding out.
>
Yes..true.
>How about this example, for this specific patch, as a changelog text:
>
>---------
>In commit 50145474f6ef ("fbcon: remove soft scrollback code"), the
>framebuffer scrollback mode was removed, but the documentation was not
>updated. Properly update the documentation by removing the option that
>is no longer present, and update the section numbering because of the
>removal.
>---------
Just like an pointed arrow ..perfect...cut to the cheese!
>
>Doesn't that make more sense about what is happening here, and provide
>enough information that when someone 10+ years from now goes and tries
>to find out why a boot option went away, what exactly happened and why?
>
Absolutely.
>Can you make this type of change to all 4 of these patches and resend
>them, with the proper change information below the --- line as a v4
>series?
>
Certain thing...will incorporate your suggestions in V4 and send.
>thanks,
Indebted for your and others patience for standing this long ..thank you!
>
>greg k-h
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists