[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMxfBF5WWQX3ZH0YcRZ_N8q4njTdG-RA4eM+zyQwmK7tYvw6DQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 10:32:35 +0200
From: Grzegorz Jaszczyk <grzegorz.jaszczyk@...aro.org>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...cle.com>,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@...com>, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: soc: ti: ti,pruss: fix schema ID
On Thu, 17 Sep 2020 at 09:05, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Add missing '#' to fix schema errors:
>
> $id: 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml' does not match 'http://devicetree.org/schemas/.*\\.yaml#'
> $schema: 'http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml' is not one of ['http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#', 'http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/base.yaml#']
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml: ignoring, error in schema: $id
>
> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
> index cf7dc83f724f..037c51b2f972 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
> @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> %YAML 1.2
> ---
> -$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml
> -$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/soc/ti/ti,pruss.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
I've double checked and "#" was present in the original patch sent and
ack for upstream: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/11729649/
It seems like something got wrong on linux-next but this is the only
diff between original patch and one found in linux-next. Thank you for
taking care of it.
Best regards,
Grzegorz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists