[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200917113110.GE8409@ziepe.ca>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 08:31:10 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
"moderated list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"open list:DMA BUFFER SHARING FRAMEWORK"
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Linaro-mm-sig] Changing vma->vm_file in dma_buf_mmap()
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 10:09:12AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Yeah, but it doesn't work when forwarding from the drm chardev to the
> dma-buf on the importer side, since you'd need a ton of different
> address spaces. And you still rely on the core code picking up your
> pgoff mangling, which feels about as risky to me as the vma file
> pointer wrangling - if it's not consistently applied the reverse map
> is toast and unmap_mapping_range doesn't work correctly for our needs.
I would think the pgoff has to be translated at the same time the
vm->vm_file is changed?
The owner of the dma_buf should have one virtual address space and FD,
all its dma bufs should be linked to it, and all pgoffs translated to
that space.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists