lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <691578e1e0844c7c876a54c6ff9c2f0a@huawei.com>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 11:54:43 +0000
From:   linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
CC:     "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: avoid possible multiple call to swap_node()

Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 07:44:49AM -0400, Miaohe Lin wrote:
>> Cache the swap_node() in a local variable to avoid possible multiple 
>> call to swap_node(), though compiler may do this for us.
>
>Why don't you find out?  Compare the assembly before and after, see what the compiler did.

In fact, I don't care if the compiler can really do this for us. I think it's better to do this explicity. I think this can improve the readability.
Thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ