| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200917123951.GP18329@kadam>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:39:51 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Souptick Joarder <jrdr.linux@...il.com>, jhubbard@...dia.com
Cc: mporter@...nel.crashing.org, alex.bou9@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, gustavoars@...nel.org,
madhuparnabhowmik10@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [linux-next PATCH] rapidio: Fix error handling path
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 01:02:32PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 09:12:17AM +0530, Souptick Joarder wrote:
> > There is an error when pin_user_pages_fast() returns -ERRNO and
> > inside error handling path driver end up calling unpin_user_pages()
> > with -ERRNO which is not correct.
> >
> > This patch will fix the problem.
>
> There are a few ways we could prevent bug in the future.
>
> 1) This could have been caught with existing static analysis tools
> which warn about when a value is set but not used.
>
> 2) I've created a Smatch check which warngs about:
>
> drivers/rapidio/devices/rio_mport_cdev.c:955 rio_dma_transfer() warn: unpinning negative pages 'nr_pages'
>
> I'll test it out tonight and see how well it works. I don't
> immediately see any other bugs allthough Smatch doesn't like the code
> in siw_umem_release(). It uses "min_t(int" which suggests that
> negative pages are okay.
>
> int to_free = min_t(int, PAGES_PER_CHUNK, num_pages);
>
I only found one bug but I'm going to add unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock()
to the mix a retest. There were a few other false positives. In
reviewing the code, I noticed that orangefs_bufmap_map() is also buggy.
I sort of feel like returning partial successes is not working. We
could easily make a wrapper which either pins everything or it returns
an error code.
drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c:1399 __scif_pin_pages() warn: unpinning negative pages 'pinned_pages->nr_pages'
drivers/misc/mic/scif/scif_rma.c
1355 vmalloc_addr = true;
1356
1357 for (i = 0; i < nr_pages; i++) {
1358 if (vmalloc_addr)
1359 pinned_pages->pages[i] =
1360 vmalloc_to_page(addr + (i * PAGE_SIZE));
1361 else
1362 pinned_pages->pages[i] =
1363 virt_to_page(addr + (i * PAGE_SIZE));
1364 }
1365 pinned_pages->nr_pages = nr_pages;
1366 pinned_pages->map_flags = SCIF_MAP_KERNEL;
1367 } else {
1368 /*
1369 * SCIF supports registration caching. If a registration has
1370 * been requested with read only permissions, then we try
1371 * to pin the pages with RW permissions so that a subsequent
1372 * transfer with RW permission can hit the cache instead of
1373 * invalidating it. If the upgrade fails with RW then we
1374 * revert back to R permission and retry
1375 */
1376 if (prot == SCIF_PROT_READ)
1377 try_upgrade = true;
1378 prot |= SCIF_PROT_WRITE;
1379 retry:
1380 mm = current->mm;
1381 if (ulimit) {
1382 err = __scif_check_inc_pinned_vm(mm, nr_pages);
1383 if (err) {
1384 pinned_pages->nr_pages = 0;
1385 goto error_unmap;
1386 }
1387 }
1388
1389 pinned_pages->nr_pages = pin_user_pages_fast(
1390 (u64)addr,
1391 nr_pages,
1392 (prot & SCIF_PROT_WRITE) ? FOLL_WRITE : 0,
1393 pinned_pages->pages);
1394 if (nr_pages != pinned_pages->nr_pages) {
1395 if (try_upgrade) {
1396 if (ulimit)
1397 __scif_dec_pinned_vm_lock(mm, nr_pages);
1398 /* Roll back any pinned pages */
1399 unpin_user_pages(pinned_pages->pages,
1400 pinned_pages->nr_pages);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Negative.
1401 prot &= ~SCIF_PROT_WRITE;
1402 try_upgrade = false;
1403 goto retry;
1404 }
1405 }
1406 pinned_pages->map_flags = 0;
1407 }
1408
1409 if (pinned_pages->nr_pages < nr_pages) {
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
These are both signed so it negative ->nr_pages are less than nr_pages.
1410 err = -EFAULT;
1411 pinned_pages->nr_pages = nr_pages;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This sets it to "everything was pinned".
1412 goto dec_pinned;
1413 }
1414
1415 *out_prot = prot;
1416 atomic_set(&pinned_pages->ref_count, 1);
1417 *pages = pinned_pages;
1418 return err;
1419 dec_pinned:
1420 if (ulimit)
1421 __scif_dec_pinned_vm_lock(mm, nr_pages);
1422 /* Something went wrong! Rollback */
1423 error_unmap:
1424 pinned_pages->nr_pages = nr_pages;
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
This assumes everything was pinned successfully.
1425 scif_destroy_pinned_pages(pinned_pages);
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
We absolutely don't want to pass negative ->nr_pages to this function
either.
1426 *pages = NULL;
1427 dev_dbg(scif_info.mdev.this_device,
1428 "%s %d err %d len 0x%lx\n", __func__, __LINE__, err, len);
1429 return err;
1430 }
regards,
dan carpenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists