lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200917020440.GQ3421308@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 03:04:40 +0100
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>
Cc:     torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, vgoyal@...hat.com,
        miklos@...redi.hu, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: slab-out-of-bounds in iov_iter_revert()

On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:09:49PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> On Sat, 2020-09-12 at 00:55 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 05:59:04PM -0400, Qian Cai wrote:
> > > Super easy to reproduce on today's mainline by just fuzzing for a few
> > > minutes
> > > on virtiofs (if it ever matters). Any thoughts?
> > 
> > Usually happens when ->direct_IO() fucks up and reports the wrong amount
> > of data written/read.  We had several bugs like that in the past - see
> > e.g. 85128b2be673 (fix nfs O_DIRECT advancing iov_iter too much).
> > 
> > Had there been any recent O_DIRECT-related patches on the filesystems
> > involved?
> 
> This is only reproducible using FUSE/virtiofs so far, so I will stare at
> fuse_direct_IO() until someone can beat me to it.

What happens there is that it tries to play with iov_iter_truncate() in
->direct_IO() without a corresponding iov_iter_reexpand().  Could you
check if the following helps?

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
---
diff --git a/fs/fuse/file.c b/fs/fuse/file.c
index 6611ef3269a8..d3eec2e11975 100644
--- a/fs/fuse/file.c
+++ b/fs/fuse/file.c
@@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 	loff_t pos = 0;
 	struct inode *inode;
 	loff_t i_size;
-	size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter);
+	size_t count = iov_iter_count(iter), shortened;
 	loff_t offset = iocb->ki_pos;
 	struct fuse_io_priv *io;
 
@@ -3111,7 +3111,8 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 		if (offset >= i_size)
 			return 0;
 		iov_iter_truncate(iter, fuse_round_up(ff->fc, i_size - offset));
-		count = iov_iter_count(iter);
+		shortened = count - iov_iter_count(iter);
+		count -= shortened;
 	}
 
 	io = kmalloc(sizeof(struct fuse_io_priv), GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -3177,6 +3178,8 @@ fuse_direct_IO(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *iter)
 		else if (ret < 0 && offset + count > i_size)
 			fuse_do_truncate(file);
 	}
+	if (shortened)
+		iov_iter_reexpand(iter, shortened);
 
 	return ret;
 }

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ