lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 15:19:36 +0100
From:   Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
To:     Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc:     Dan Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
        Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Yong Zhi <yong.zhi@...el.com>,
        Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
        Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
        Tian Shu Qiu <tian.shu.qiu@...el.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        "open list:STAGING SUBSYSTEM" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
        jorhand@...ux.microsoft.com,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tsuchiya Yuto <kitakar@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] Add bridge driver to connect sensors to CIO2 device
 via software nodes on ACPI platforms

Hi Andy,

On 17/09/2020 15:08, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 4:31 PM Kieran Bingham
> <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com> wrote:
>> On 17/09/2020 10:47, Dan Scally wrote:
>>> On 17/09/2020 08:53, Greg KH wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 10:36:18PM +0100, Daniel Scally wrote:
> 
>>>>>  drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Kconfig       |  15 +
>>>>>  drivers/staging/media/ipu3/Makefile      |   1 +
>>>>>  drivers/staging/media/ipu3/cio2-bridge.c | 448 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>> Why does this have to be in drivers/staging/ at all?  Why not spend the
>>>> time to fix it up properly and get it merged correctly?  It's a very
>>>> small driver, and should be smaller, so it should not be a lot of work
>>>> to do.  And it would be faster to do that than to take it through
>>>> staging...
>>> I was just under the impression that that was the process to be honest,
>>> if that's not right I'll just move it directly to drivers/media/ipu3
>>
>> The IPU3 driver is still in staging (unless I've missed something), so I
>> think this cio2-bridge should stay with it.
> 
> You missed something.
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.9-rc5/source/drivers/media/pci/intel
> 
> IPU3 from Freescale (IIRC) is a different story.

Ayee, ok so we have 'half' the driver for IPU3 out of staging.

>From my understanding, the IPU3 consists of two components, the CIO2
(CSI2 capture), and the IMGU (the ISP).

- drivers/media/pci/intel/ipu3

This is indeed the CIO2 component (config VIDEO_IPU3_CIO2), and that is
the part that this bridge relates to, so in fact this cio2-bridge should
probably go there indeed. No need to go through staging.

The files remaining at:

- drivers/staging/media/ipu3

are in fact also for the IPU3 but the ISP component (VIDEO_IPU3_IMGU).

I'm sorry for the confusion, I knew that the ISP was still in staging, I
hadn't realised the CSI2 receiver (CIO2) was not.

>> Hopefully with more users of the IPU3 brought in by this cio2-bridge,
>> that will help gather momentum to get the IPU3 developments required
>> completed and moved into drivers/media.

-- 
Regards
--
Kieran

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ