linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] Add VFIO mediated device support and DEV-MSI support for the idxd driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 12:06:41 -0300
From:   Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To:     Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@...el.com>
CC:     <vkoul@...nel.org>, <megha.dey@...el.com>, <maz@...nel.org>,
        <bhelgaas@...gle.com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        <alex.williamson@...hat.com>, <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        <ashok.raj@...el.com>, <yi.l.liu@...el.com>, <baolu.lu@...el.com>,
        <kevin.tian@...el.com>, <sanjay.k.kumar@...el.com>,
        <tony.luck@...el.com>, <jing.lin@...el.com>,
        <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <kwankhede@...dia.com>,
        <eric.auger@...hat.com>, <parav@...lanox.com>, <rafael@...nel.org>,
        <netanelg@...lanox.com>, <shahafs@...lanox.com>,
        <yan.y.zhao@...ux.intel.com>, <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
        <samuel.ortiz@...el.com>, <mona.hossain@...el.com>,
        <dmaengine@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <x86@...nel.org>, <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/18] Add VFIO mediated device support and DEV-MSI
 support for the idxd driver

On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 04:27:35PM -0700, Dave Jiang wrote:
>  drivers/dma/idxd/idxd.h                            |   65 +
>  drivers/dma/idxd/init.c                            |  100 ++
>  drivers/dma/idxd/irq.c                             |    6 
>  drivers/dma/idxd/mdev.c                            | 1089 ++++++++++++++++++++
>  drivers/dma/idxd/mdev.h                            |  118 ++

It is common that drivers of a subsystem will be under that
subsystem's directory tree. This allows the subsystem community to
manage pages related to their subsystem and it's drivers.

Should the mdev parts be moved there?

Jason