[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <316cf147-0ae2-1c88-7375-07aedc58bd15@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 08:16:37 +0200
From: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To: John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH printk 2/3] printk: move dictionary keys to
dev_printk_info
On 17/09/2020 15.16, John Ogness wrote:
> if (dev->class)
> subsys = dev->class->name;
> else if (dev->bus)
> subsys = dev->bus->name;
> else
> - return 0;
> + return;
>
> - pos += snprintf(hdr + pos, hdrlen - pos, "SUBSYSTEM=%s", subsys);
> - if (pos >= hdrlen)
> - goto overflow;
> + snprintf(dev_info->subsystem, sizeof(dev_info->subsystem), subsys);
It's unlikely that subsys would contain a %, but this will be yet
another place to spend brain cycles ignoring if doing static analysis.
So can we not do this. Either of strXcpy() for X=s,l will do the same
thing, and likely faster.
Rasmus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists