[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918100432.GJ35926@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 12:04:32 +0200
From: peterz@...radead.org
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Boaz Harrosh <boaz@...xistor.com>,
Hou Tao <houtao1@...wei.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] locking/percpu-rwsem: use this_cpu_{inc|dec}() for
read_count
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:01:12PM +0200, peterz@...radead.org wrote:
> @@ -198,7 +198,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__percpu_down_read);
> */
> static bool readers_active_check(struct percpu_rw_semaphore *sem)
> {
> - if (per_cpu_sum(*sem->read_count) != 0)
> + u64 sum = per_cpu_sum(*(u64 *)sem->read_count);
> +
> + if (sum + (sum >> 32))
That obviously wants to be:
if ((u32)(sum + (sum >> 32)))
> return false;
>
> /*
Powered by blists - more mailing lists