[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918110223.GA10235@laptop-alex>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 19:02:23 +0800
From: Alex Lu <alex_lu@...lsil.com.cn>
To: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
CC: Johan Hedberg <johan.hedberg@...il.com>,
<linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Max Chou <max.chou@...ltek.com>
Subject: [PATCH] Bluetooth: Fix the vulnerable issue on enc key size
When someone attacks the service provider, it creates connection,
authenticates. Then it requests key size of one byte and it identifies
the key with brute force methods.
After l2cap info req/resp exchange is complete. the attacker sends l2cap
connect with specific PSM.
In above procedure, there is no chance for the service provider to check
the encryption key size before l2cap_connect(). Because the state of
l2cap chan in conn->chan_l is BT_LISTEN, there is no l2cap chan with the
state of BT_CONNECT or BT_CONNECT2.
So service provider should check the encryption key size in
l2cap_connect()
Signed-off-by: Alex Lu <alex_lu@...lsil.com.cn>
---
net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
index ade83e224567..63df961d402d 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/l2cap_core.c
@@ -4150,6 +4150,13 @@ static struct l2cap_chan *l2cap_connect(struct l2cap_conn *conn,
if (conn->info_state & L2CAP_INFO_FEAT_MASK_REQ_DONE) {
if (l2cap_chan_check_security(chan, false)) {
+ if (!l2cap_check_enc_key_size(conn->hcon)) {
+ l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_DISCONN);
+ __set_chan_timer(chan, L2CAP_DISC_TIMEOUT);
+ result = L2CAP_CR_SEC_BLOCK;
+ status = L2CAP_CS_NO_INFO;
+ goto response;
+ }
if (test_bit(FLAG_DEFER_SETUP, &chan->flags)) {
l2cap_state_change(chan, BT_CONNECT2);
result = L2CAP_CR_PEND;
--
2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists