[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+x=X=m0yGCu-vsfvHRDY_6kPpiHWtktiun4yF2MxgFffg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:43:48 +0200
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH linux-next] docs:dev-tools: Fix typo in Documentation/dev-tools
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 3:44 PM Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This patch fixes some spelling typos found in
> Documentation/dev-tools.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masanari Iida <standby24x7@...il.com>
> ---
> Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst | 4 ++--
> Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst | 2 +-
> Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> index c09c9ca2ff1c..49ec0ab6cfc7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kasan.rst
> @@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ using something like insmod or modprobe. The module is called ``test_kasan``.
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> With ``CONFIG_KUNIT`` built-in, ``CONFIG_KASAN_KUNIT_TEST`` can be built-in
> -on any architecure that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
> +on any architecture that supports KASAN. These and any other KUnit
> tests enabled will run and print the results at boot as a late-init
> call.
>
> @@ -349,5 +349,5 @@ converted to KUnit. These tests can be run only as a module with
> ``CONFIG_KASAN`` built-in. The type of error expected and the
> function being run is printed before the expression expected to give
> an error. Then the error is printed, if found, and that test
> -should be interpretted to pass only if the error was the one expected
> +should be interpreted to pass only if the error was the one expected
> by the test.
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> index 8548b0b04e43..d2c4c27e1702 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kcov.rst
> @@ -243,7 +243,7 @@ handles as they don't belong to a particular subsystem. The bytes 4-7 are
> currently reserved and must be zero. In the future the number of bytes
> used for the subsystem or handle ids might be increased.
>
> -When a particular userspace proccess collects coverage via a common
> +When a particular userspace process collects coverage via a common
> handle, kcov will collect coverage for each code section that is annotated
> to use the common handle obtained as kcov_handle from the current
> task_struct. However non common handles allow to collect coverage
> diff --git a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> index a41a2d238af2..1c935f41cd3a 100644
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/kmemleak.rst
> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Testing with kmemleak-test
>
> To check if you have all set up to use kmemleak, you can use the kmemleak-test
> module, a module that deliberately leaks memory. Set CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_TEST
> -as module (it can't be used as bult-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
> +as module (it can't be used as built-in) and boot the kernel with kmemleak
> enabled. Load the module and perform a scan with::
>
> # modprobe kmemleak-test
Reviewed-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists