[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a07PbzpGfnVew7VAq2=iD418V-ryvOC94qAQzW0nQAbAA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 15:48:35 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:BROADCOM NVRAM DRIVER" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>,
Parisc List <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390 <linux-s390@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-block <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-aio <linux-aio@...ck.org>, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, keyrings@...r.kernel.org,
LSM List <linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] mm: remove compat_process_vm_{readv,writev}
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 2:45 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> Now that import_iovec handles compat iovecs, the native syscalls
> can be used for the compat case as well.
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> index a4840b9d50ad14..f2fe0a33bcfdd5 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/syscall_x32.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,8 @@
> #define __x32_sys_getsockopt __x64_sys_getsockopt
> #define __x32_sys_setsockopt __x64_sys_setsockopt
> #define __x32_sys_vmsplice __x64_sys_vmsplice
> +#define __x32_sys_process_vm_readv __x64_sys_process_vm_readv
> +#define __x32_sys_process_vm_writev __x64_sys_process_vm_writev
>
> #define __SYSCALL_64(nr, sym)
>
I forgot this hack existed, and just sent a patch with subject "x86: add
__X32_COND_SYSCALL() macro" instead.
If I understand this right, the macros above should no longer be needed
once my patch gets merged.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists