[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918160532.GA320440@nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:05:32 -0300
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
To: Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>
CC: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>,
Artemy Kovalyov <artemyko@...lanox.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
Moni Shoua <monis@...lanox.com>,
Yishai Hadas <yishaih@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH rdma-next 0/5] Reorganize mlx5 UMR creation flow
On Mon, Sep 14, 2020 at 02:26:48PM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
> From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...dia.com>
>
> This flow has become crufty and confusing. Revise it so that the rules
> on how UMR is used with MRs is much clearer and more correct.
>
> Fixes a few minor bugs in ODP and rereg_mr where disallowed things were
> not properly blocked.
>
> Thanks
>
> Jason Gunthorpe (5):
> RDMA/mlx5: Remove dead check for EAGAIN after alloc_mr_from_cache()
> RDMA/mlx5: Use set_mkc_access_pd_addr_fields() in reg_create()
> RDMA/mlx5: Make mkeys always owned by the kernel's PD when not enabled
> RDMA/mlx5: Disable IB_DEVICE_MEM_MGT_EXTENSIONS if IB_WR_REG_MR can't
> work
> RDMA/mlx5: Clarify what the UMR is for when creating MRs
Applied to for-next
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists