[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200918200252.GH32101@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 21:02:52 +0100
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <gustavoars@...nel.org>,
Dennis Zhou <dennis@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] percpu fix for v5.9-rc6
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:37:48PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Applying sizeof() to a structure containing a flex-array member is allowed,
>
> Yes, and that's wrong and inconsistent, but what else is new about the
> C standard. It's what allows these kinds of bugs to slip through.
Hmm. We actually do that in our implementation of struct_size()
#define struct_size(p, member, count) \
__ab_c_size(count, \
sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member),\
sizeof(*(p)))
I suppose it's not really necessary, we could do offsetof here, right?
#define struct_size(p, member, count) \
__ab_c_size(count, \
sizeof(*(p)->member) + __must_be_array((p)->member),\
offsetof(typeof(*(p)), member))
Powered by blists - more mailing lists