linux-kernel - [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 56/90] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200918021455.2067301-56-sashal@kernel.org>
Date:   Thu, 17 Sep 2020 22:14:21 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 56/90] cpufreq: powernv: Fix frame-size-overflow in powernv_cpufreq_work_fn

From: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@...ux.ibm.com>

[ Upstream commit d95fe371ecd28901f11256c610b988ed44e36ee2 ]

The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'

Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200316135743.57735-1-psampat@linux.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
index b4fc65512aad3..c3b05676e0dbe 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
@@ -802,6 +802,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
 void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
 	struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
+	struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
 	unsigned int cpu;
 	cpumask_t mask;
 
@@ -816,12 +817,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
 	chip->restore = false;
 	for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
 		int index;
-		struct cpufreq_policy policy;
 
-		cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
-		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
-		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
-		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
+		policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
+		if (!policy)
+			continue;
+		index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
+		powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
+		cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
+		cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
 	}
 out:
 	put_online_cpus();
-- 
2.25.1