[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4296985-7296-b5c9-45f3-b03d28bc7bd8@huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 11:57:06 +0800
From: chenzhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
To: Dave Young <dyoung@...hat.com>
CC: <catalin.marinas@....com>, <will@...nel.org>,
<james.morse@....com>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
<bhe@...hat.com>, <corbet@....net>, <John.P.donnelly@...cle.com>,
<prabhakar.pkin@...il.com>, <bhsharma@...hat.com>,
<horms@...ge.net.au>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <arnd@...db.de>,
<nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kexec@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
<xiexiuqi@...wei.com>, <huawei.libin@...wei.com>,
<wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 3/9] x86: kdump: use macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX in
functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]()
Hi Dave,
On 2020/9/18 11:01, Dave Young wrote:
> On 09/07/20 at 09:47pm, Chen Zhou wrote:
>> To make the functions reserve_crashkernel[_low]() as generic,
>> replace some hard-coded numbers with macro CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Zhou <chenzhou10@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/setup.c | 11 ++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> index d7fd90c52dae..71a6a6e7ca5b 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
>> @@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
>> unsigned long total_low_mem;
>> int ret;
>>
>> - total_low_mem = memblock_mem_size(1UL << (32 - PAGE_SHIFT));
>> + total_low_mem = memblock_mem_size(CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> total_low_mem != CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX
I just replace the magic number with macro, no other change.
Besides, function memblock_mem_size(limit_pfn) will compute the memory size
according to the actual system ram.
Thanks,
Chen Zhou
>
>>
>> /* crashkernel=Y,low */
>> ret = parse_crashkernel_low(boot_command_line, total_low_mem, &low_size, &base);
> The param total_low_mem is for dynamically change crash_size according
> to system ram size.
>
> Is above change a must for your arm64 patches?
See above.
>
>> @@ -451,7 +451,7 @@ static int __init reserve_crashkernel_low(void)
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> - low_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, 1ULL << 32, low_size, CRASH_ALIGN);
>> + low_base = memblock_find_in_range(CRASH_ALIGN, CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX, low_size, CRASH_ALIGN);
>> if (!low_base) {
>> pr_err("Cannot reserve %ldMB crashkernel low memory, please try smaller size.\n",
>> (unsigned long)(low_size >> 20));
>> @@ -504,8 +504,9 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>> if (!crash_base) {
>> /*
>> * Set CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX upper bound for crash memory,
>> - * crashkernel=x,high reserves memory over 4G, also allocates
>> - * 256M extra low memory for DMA buffers and swiotlb.
>> + * crashkernel=x,high reserves memory over CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX,
>> + * also allocates 256M extra low memory for DMA buffers
>> + * and swiotlb.
>> * But the extra memory is not required for all machines.
>> * So try low memory first and fall back to high memory
>> * unless "crashkernel=size[KMG],high" is specified.
>> @@ -539,7 +540,7 @@ static void __init reserve_crashkernel(void)
>> return;
>> }
>>
>> - if (crash_base >= (1ULL << 32) && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
>> + if (crash_base >= CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX && reserve_crashkernel_low()) {
>> memblock_free(crash_base, crash_size);
>> return;
>> }
>> --
>> 2.20.1
>>
> .
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists