linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ARM: remove set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 06:27:15 +0100
From:   Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] ARM: remove set_fs callers and implementation

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 02:46:15PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Hi Christoph, Russell,
> 
> Here is an updated series for removing set_fs() from arch/arm,
> based on the previous feedback.
> 
> I have tested the oabi-compat changes using the LTP tests for the three
> modified syscalls using an Armv7 kernel and a Debian 5 OABI user space,
> and I have lightly tested the get_kernel_nofault infrastructure by
> loading the test_lockup.ko module after setting CONFIG_DEBUG_SPINLOCK.

What is the base line?  Just the base.set_fs branch in Als tree, or do
you need anything from my RISC-V series?