[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200919094418.GC12294@duo.ucw.cz>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 11:44:18 +0200
From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To: Alexander Dahl <post@...pocky.de>
Cc: linux-leds@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@...il.com>,
Dan Murphy <dmurphy@...com>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
Marek BehĂșn <marek.behun@....cz>,
Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>,
Denis Osterland-Heim <denis.osterland@...hl.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] leds: pwm: Remove platform_data support
Hi!
> Since commit 141f15c66d94 ("leds: pwm: remove header") that platform
> interface is not usable from outside and there seems to be no in tree
> user anymore. All in-tree users of the leds-pwm driver seem to use DT
> currently. Getting rid of the old platform interface will allow the
> leds-pwm driver to switch over from 'devm_led_classdev_register()' to
> 'devm_led_classdev_register_ext()' later.
> @@ -61,6 +56,7 @@ static int led_pwm_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
> return pwm_apply_state(led_dat->pwm, &led_dat->pwmstate);
> }
>
> +__attribute__((nonnull))
> static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
> struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
> {
This normally goes elsewhere -- right? I'd expect:
static int led_pwm_add(struct device *dev, struct led_pwm_priv *priv,
struct led_pwm *led, struct fwnode_handle *fwnode)
__attribute__((nonnull))
Best regards,
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists