[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200919161939.374bac95@archlinux>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 16:19:39 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Cc: <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <kgene@...nel.org>,
<krzk@...nel.org>, Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] iio: adc: exynos_adc: Replace indio_dev->mlock with
own device lock
On Wed, 16 Sep 2020 12:31:23 +0300
Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com> wrote:
> From: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
>
> As part of the general cleanup of indio_dev->mlock, this change replaces
> it with a local lock, to protect potential concurrent access to the
> completion callback during a conversion.
>
> This is part of a bigger cleanup.
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iio/CA+U=Dsoo6YABe5ODLp+eFNPGFDjk5ZeQEceGkqjxXcVEhLWubw@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Sergiu Cuciurean <sergiu.cuciurean@...log.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@...log.com>
Applied to the togreg branch of iio.git and pushed out as testing for the
autobuilders to play with it.
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> index 20477b249f2a..99f4404e9fd1 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/exynos_adc.c
> @@ -138,6 +138,16 @@ struct exynos_adc {
> bool read_ts;
> u32 ts_x;
> u32 ts_y;
> +
> + /*
> + * Lock to protect from potential concurrent access to the
> + * completion callback during a manual conversion. For this driver
> + * a wait-callback is used to wait for the conversion result,
> + * so in the meantime no other read request (or conversion start)
> + * must be performed, otherwise it would interfere with the
> + * current conversion result.
> + */
> + struct mutex lock;
> };
>
> struct exynos_adc_data {
> @@ -542,7 +552,7 @@ static int exynos_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> reinit_completion(&info->completion);
>
> /* Select the channel to be used and Trigger conversion */
> @@ -562,7 +572,7 @@ static int exynos_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> ret = IIO_VAL_INT;
> }
>
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -573,7 +583,7 @@ static int exynos_read_s3c64xx_ts(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int *x, int *y)
> unsigned long timeout;
> int ret;
>
> - mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_lock(&info->lock);
> info->read_ts = true;
>
> reinit_completion(&info->completion);
> @@ -598,7 +608,7 @@ static int exynos_read_s3c64xx_ts(struct iio_dev *indio_dev, int *x, int *y)
> }
>
> info->read_ts = false;
> - mutex_unlock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> + mutex_unlock(&info->lock);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -868,6 +878,8 @@ static int exynos_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> indio_dev->channels = exynos_adc_iio_channels;
> indio_dev->num_channels = info->data->num_channels;
>
> + mutex_init(&info->lock);
> +
> ret = request_irq(info->irq, exynos_adc_isr,
> 0, dev_name(&pdev->dev), info);
> if (ret < 0) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists