[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrVDqHG2chDsLWBHF39SXh6vjzE_xcEs+AWgOg5531BLuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 09:23:22 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] x86: add __X32_COND_SYSCALL() macro
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:35 PM Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 03:24:36PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > sys_move_pages() is an optional syscall, and once we remove
> > the compat version of it in favor of the native one with an
> > in_compat_syscall() check, the x32 syscall table refers to
> > a __x32_sys_move_pages symbol that may not exist when the
> > syscall is disabled.
> >
> > Change the COND_SYSCALL() definition on x86 to also include
> > the redirection for x32.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
>
> Adding the x86 maintainers and Brian Gerst. Brian proposed another
> problem to the mess that most of the compat syscall handlers used by
> x32 here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/16/664
>
> hpa didn't particularly like it, but with your and my pending series
> we'll soon use more native than compat syscalls for x32, so something
> will need to change..
I'm fine with either solution.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists