linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 101/330] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Fix ref count for devices with their own PE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 14:10:29 -0400
From:   Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To:     Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Donnellan <ajd@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
        linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 5.4 101/330] powerpc/powernv/ioda: Fix ref count
 for devices with their own PE

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 08:35:06AM +0200, Frederic Barrat wrote:
>
>
>Le 18/09/2020 à 03:57, Sasha Levin a écrit :
>>From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>
>>
>>[ Upstream commit 05dd7da76986937fb288b4213b1fa10dbe0d1b33 ]
>>
>
>This patch is not desirable for stable, for 5.4 and 4.19 (it was 
>already flagged by autosel back in April. Not sure why it's showing 
>again now)

Hey Fred,

This was a bit of a "lie", it wasn't a run of AUTOSEL, but rather an
audit of patches that went into distro/vendor trees but not into the
upstream stable trees.

I can see that this patch was pulled into Ubuntu's 5.4 tree, is it not
needed in the upstream stable tree?

-- 
Thanks,
Sasha