linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/7] crypto: sun4i-ss: handle BigEndian for cipher

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 19 Sep 2020 21:05:08 +0200
From:   LABBE Corentin <clabbe@...libre.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc:     arnd@...db.de, davem@...emloft.net, mripard@...nel.org,
        wens@...e.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] crypto: sun4i-ss: handle BigEndian for cipher

On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 06:09:15PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 10:06:58AM +0200, LABBE Corentin wrote:
> >
> > But I think only me will see it and since I already have this on my TODO list, I dont see any interest to leave it failing.
> > Furthermore, having a clean BE boot will permit to enable BE boots for thoses SoCs on kernelCI.
> 
> I'll happily accept patches that fix the actual bug but not ones
> just papering over it.
> 

I am sorry, you are right.
Furthermore, while respining to fix it, it seems that the current fix is enough.
I have rerun a clean rebuild and test on A10/A13/A20/A33 with BE and sun4i-ss is working fine.

I will sent a clean v2.

Regards