[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALCETrXfixDGJhf0yPw-OckjEdeF2SbYjWFm8VbLriiP0Krhrg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 17:11:50 -0700
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 8/8] x86: Disallow vsyscall emulation when CET is enabled
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:23 PM Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com> wrote:
>
> Emulation of the legacy vsyscall page is required by some programs
> built before 2013. Newer programs after 2013 don't use it.
> Disable vsyscall emulation when Control-flow Enforcement (CET) is
> enabled to enhance security.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
> ---
> v12:
> - Disable vsyscall emulation only when it is attempted (vs. at compile time).
>
> arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c | 9 +++++++++
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
> index 44c33103a955..3196e963e365 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/vsyscall/vsyscall_64.c
> @@ -150,6 +150,15 @@ bool emulate_vsyscall(unsigned long error_code,
>
> WARN_ON_ONCE(address != regs->ip);
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_INTEL_CET
> + if (current->thread.cet.shstk_size ||
> + current->thread.cet.ibt_enabled) {
> + warn_bad_vsyscall(KERN_INFO, regs,
> + "vsyscall attempted with cet enabled");
> + return false;
> + }
Nope, try again. Having IBT on does *not* mean that every library in
the process knows that we have indirect branch tracking. The legacy
bitmap exists for a reason. Also, I want a way to flag programs as
not using the vsyscall page, but that flag should not be called CET.
And a process with vsyscalls off should not be able to read the
vsyscall page, and /proc/self/maps should be correct.
So you have some choices:
1. Drop this patch and make it work.
2. Add a real per-process vsyscall control. Either make it depend on
vsyscall=xonly and wire it up correctly or actually make it work
correctly with vsyscall=emulate.
NAK to any hacks in this space. Do it right or don't do it at all.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists