[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1600482287-46754-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Sep 2020 10:24:47 +0800
From: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
To: <davem@...emloft.net>, <kuba@...nel.org>, <linmiaohe@...wei.com>,
<martin.varghese@...ia.com>, <fw@...len.de>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
<dcaratti@...hat.com>, <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<pabeni@...hat.com>, <kyk.segfault@...il.com>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linuxarm@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next] net: remove unnecessary NULL checking in napi_consume_skb()
When budget is non-zero, skb_unref() has already handled the
NULL checking.
When budget is zero, the dev_consume_skb_any() has handled NULL
checking in __dev_kfree_skb_irq(), or dev_kfree_skb() which also
ultimately call skb_unref().
So remove the unnecessary checking in napi_consume_skb().
Signed-off-by: Yunsheng Lin <linyunsheng@...wei.com>
---
net/core/skbuff.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/core/skbuff.c b/net/core/skbuff.c
index bfd7483..e077447 100644
--- a/net/core/skbuff.c
+++ b/net/core/skbuff.c
@@ -895,9 +895,6 @@ void __kfree_skb_defer(struct sk_buff *skb)
void napi_consume_skb(struct sk_buff *skb, int budget)
{
- if (unlikely(!skb))
- return;
-
/* Zero budget indicate non-NAPI context called us, like netpoll */
if (unlikely(!budget)) {
dev_consume_skb_any(skb);
--
2.8.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists