[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6376bc21-0542-bdc5-fa30-4a76ab3cbc67@acm.org>
Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2020 08:29:39 -0700
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, axboe@...nel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sgl_alloc_order: memory leak
On 2020-09-19 22:36, Douglas Gilbert wrote:
> Noticed that when sgl_alloc_order() failed with order > 0 that
> free memory on my machine shrank. That function shouldn't call
> sgl_free() on its error path since that is only correct when
> order==0 .
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@...erlog.com>
> ---
> lib/scatterlist.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/scatterlist.c b/lib/scatterlist.c
> index 5d63a8857f36..c448642e0f78 100644
> --- a/lib/scatterlist.c
> +++ b/lib/scatterlist.c
> @@ -514,7 +514,7 @@ struct scatterlist *sgl_alloc_order(unsigned long long length,
> elem_len = min_t(u64, length, PAGE_SIZE << order);
> page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> if (!page) {
> - sgl_free(sgl);
> + sgl_free_order(sgl, order);
> return NULL;
> }
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists