linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] 6lowpan: Add missing locking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200920205111.GA31185@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Sun, 20 Sep 2020 22:51:11 +0200
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
To:     Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
Cc:     Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+96414aa0033c363d8458@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Lihong Kou <koulihong@...wei.com>,
        Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] 6lowpan: Add missing locking

On Sun 2020-09-20 16:14:22, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > I believe set_lock should be taken in exit function, too.
> 
> * Would an imperative wording become helpful for the change description?
> 
> * How do you think about to add the tag “Fixes” to the commit message?

Hi,

This is the semi-friendly notice stolen from Greg Kroah-Hartman.

Markus, you seem to have sent a nonsensical or otherwise pointless
review comment to a patch submission on a Linux kernel developer mailing
list.  I strongly suggest that you not do this anymore.  Please do not
bother developers who are actively working to produce patches and
features with comments that, in the end, are a waste of time.

								Pavel
-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)