linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.8 106/118] s390: add 3f program exception handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 18:28:38 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5.8 106/118] s390: add 3f program exception handler

From: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>

commit cd4d3d5f21ddbfae3f686ac0ff405f21f7847ad3 upstream.

Program exception 3f (secure storage violation) can only be detected
when the CPU is running in SIE with a format 4 state description,
e.g. running a protected guest. Because of this and because user
space partly controls the guest memory mapping and can trigger this
exception, we want to send a SIGSEGV to the process running the guest
and not panic the kernel.

Signed-off-by: Janosch Frank <frankja@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 5.7
Fixes: 084ea4d611a3 ("s390/mm: add (non)secure page access exceptions handlers")
Reviewed-by: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@...ux.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <hca@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 arch/s390/kernel/entry.h     |    1 +
 arch/s390/kernel/pgm_check.S |    2 +-
 arch/s390/mm/fault.c         |   20 ++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/kernel/entry.h
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/entry.h
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ void do_protection_exception(struct pt_r
 void do_dat_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
 void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs);
 void do_non_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs);
+void do_secure_storage_violation(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
 void addressing_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
 void data_exception(struct pt_regs *regs);
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/pgm_check.S
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/pgm_check.S
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ PGM_CHECK(do_dat_exception)		/* 3b */
 PGM_CHECK_DEFAULT			/* 3c */
 PGM_CHECK(do_secure_storage_access)	/* 3d */
 PGM_CHECK(do_non_secure_storage_access)	/* 3e */
-PGM_CHECK_DEFAULT			/* 3f */
+PGM_CHECK(do_secure_storage_violation)	/* 3f */
 PGM_CHECK(monitor_event_exception)	/* 40 */
 PGM_CHECK_DEFAULT			/* 41 */
 PGM_CHECK_DEFAULT			/* 42 */
--- a/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/fault.c
@@ -875,6 +875,21 @@ void do_non_secure_storage_access(struct
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(do_non_secure_storage_access);
 
+void do_secure_storage_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	/*
+	 * Either KVM messed up the secure guest mapping or the same
+	 * page is mapped into multiple secure guests.
+	 *
+	 * This exception is only triggered when a guest 2 is running
+	 * and can therefore never occur in kernel context.
+	 */
+	printk_ratelimited(KERN_WARNING
+			   "Secure storage violation in task: %s, pid %d\n",
+			   current->comm, current->pid);
+	send_sig(SIGSEGV, current, 0);
+}
+
 #else
 void do_secure_storage_access(struct pt_regs *regs)
 {
@@ -885,4 +900,9 @@ void do_non_secure_storage_access(struct
 {
 	default_trap_handler(regs);
 }
+
+void do_secure_storage_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
+{
+	default_trap_handler(regs);
+}
 #endif