[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200921072424.14813-3-vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:24:22 +0200
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
To: mingo@...hat.com, peterz@...radead.org, juri.lelli@...hat.com,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: valentin.schneider@....com, pauld@...hat.com, hdanton@...a.com,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/4 v2] sched/fair: reduce minimal imbalance threshold
The 25% default imbalance threshold for DIE and NUMA domain is large
enough to generate significant unfairness between threads. A typical
example is the case of 11 threads running on 2x4 CPUs. The imbalance of
20% between the 2 groups of 4 cores is just low enough to not trigger
the load balance between the 2 groups. We will have always the same 6
threads on one group of 4 CPUs and the other 5 threads on the other
group of CPUS. With a fair time sharing in each group, we ends up with
+20% running time for the group of 5 threads.
Consider decreasing the imbalance threshold for overloaded case where we
use the load to balance task and to ensure fair time sharing.
Acked-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@...a.com>
Reviewed-by: Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
---
kernel/sched/topology.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/topology.c b/kernel/sched/topology.c
index 249bec7b0a4c..41df62884cea 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/topology.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/topology.c
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@ sd_init(struct sched_domain_topology_level *tl,
.min_interval = sd_weight,
.max_interval = 2*sd_weight,
.busy_factor = 32,
- .imbalance_pct = 125,
+ .imbalance_pct = 117,
.cache_nice_tries = 0,
--
2.17.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists