[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921181841.GB2067@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 20:18:41 +0200
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Johannes Thumshirn <Johannes.Thumshirn@....com>,
Justin Sanders <justin@...aid.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, dm-devel@...hat.com,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drbd-dev@...ts.linbit.com,
linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/13] bcache: inherit the optimal I/O size
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 11:09:48PM +0800, Coly Li wrote:
> I feel this is something should be fixed. Indeed I overlooked it until
> you point out the issue now.
>
> The optimal request size and read ahead pages hint are necessary, but
> current initialization is simple. A better way might be dynamically
> setting them depends on the cache mode and some special configuration.
>
> By your inspiration, I want to ACK your original patch although it
> doesn't work fine for all condition. Then we may know these two settings
> (ra_pages and queue_io_opt) should be improved for more situations. At
> lease for most part of the situations they provide proper hints.
>
> How do you think of the above idea ?
Sounds like a plan. I'd reall like to get this series in to get
some soaking before the end of the merge window, but we should still
have plenty of time for localized bcache updates.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists