[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921194156.GM5901@zn.tnic>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 21:41:56 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko.sakkinen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
Jethro Beekman <jethro@...tanix.com>,
Darren Kenny <darren.kenny@...cle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, asapek@...gle.com,
cedric.xing@...el.com, chenalexchen@...gle.com,
conradparker@...gle.com, cyhanish@...gle.com,
dave.hansen@...el.com, haitao.huang@...el.com,
josh@...htriplett.org, kai.huang@...el.com, kai.svahn@...el.com,
kmoy@...gle.com, ludloff@...gle.com, nhorman@...hat.com,
npmccallum@...hat.com, puiterwijk@...hat.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
sean.j.christopherson@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
yaozhangx@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v38 15/24] x86/sgx: Enable provisioning for remote
attestation
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 10:27:06PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> 'sgx_dev_enclave' is successfully register whenever that happens. Am I
> missing something here?
No, I was missing the fact that you have *two* misc devices and you're
deregistering the first one in the error path of the second.
Forget what I said. ;-\
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists