[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87a6xjd1dw.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 09:39:39 +0200
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
Max Filippov <jcmvbkbc@...il.com>,
linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>,
"open list\:SYNOPSYS ARC ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, Nick Hu <nickhu@...estech.com>,
Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>,
Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
linux-sparc <sparclinux@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch RFC 00/15] mm/highmem: Provide a preemptible variant of kmap_atomic & friends
On Sun, Sep 20 2020 at 10:42, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 10:40 AM Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>>
>> I think the more obvious solution is to split the whole exercise:
>>
>> schedule()
>> prepare_switch()
>> unmap()
>>
>> switch_to()
>>
>> finish_switch()
>> map()
>
> Yeah, that looks much easier to explain. Ack.
So far so good, but Peter Z. just pointed out to me that I completely
missed the fact that this cannot work.
If a task is migrated to a different CPU then the mapping address will
change which will explode in colourful ways.
On RT kernels this works because we ping the task to the CPU via
migrate_disable(). On a !RT kernel migrate_disable() maps to
preempt_disable() which brings us back to square one.
/me goes back to the drawing board.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists