[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921081200.GE12990@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 10:12:00 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
To: zangchunxin@...edance.com
Cc: hannes@...xchg.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tj@...nel.org, lizefan@...wei.com,
corbet@....net, ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, kafai@...com,
songliubraving@...com, yhs@...com, andriin@...com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, kpsingh@...omium.org,
cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/memcontrol: Add the drop_cache interface for cgroup v2
On Mon 21-09-20 16:02:55, zangchunxin@...edance.com wrote:
> From: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@...edance.com>
>
> In the cgroup v1, we have 'force_mepty' interface. This is very
> useful for userspace to actively release memory. But the cgroup
> v2 does not.
>
> This patch reuse cgroup v1's function, but have a new name for
> the interface. Because I think 'drop_cache' may be is easier to
> understand :)
This should really explain a usecase. Global drop_caches is a terrible
interface and it has caused many problems in the past. People have
learned to use it as a remedy to any problem they might see and cause
other problems without realizing that. This is the reason why we even
log each attempt to drop caches.
I would rather not repeat the same mistake on the memcg level unless
there is a very strong reason for it.
> Signed-off-by: Chunxin Zang <zangchunxin@...edance.com>
> ---
> Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 11 +++++++++++
> mm/memcontrol.c | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> index ce3e05e41724..fbff959c8116 100644
> --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> @@ -1181,6 +1181,17 @@ PAGE_SIZE multiple when read back.
> high limit is used and monitored properly, this limit's
> utility is limited to providing the final safety net.
>
> + memory.drop_cache
> + A write-only single value file which exists on non-root
> + cgroups.
> +
> + Provide a mechanism for users to actively trigger memory
> + reclaim. The cgroup will be reclaimed and as many pages
> + reclaimed as possible.
> +
> + It will broke low boundary. Because it tries to reclaim the
> + memory many times, until the memory drops to a certain level.
> +
> memory.oom.group
> A read-write single value file which exists on non-root
> cgroups. The default value is "0".
> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
> index 0b38b6ad547d..98646484efff 100644
> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
> @@ -6226,6 +6226,11 @@ static struct cftype memory_files[] = {
> .write = memory_max_write,
> },
> {
> + .name = "drop_cache",
> + .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> + .write = mem_cgroup_force_empty_write,
> + },
> + {
> .name = "events",
> .flags = CFTYPE_NOT_ON_ROOT,
> .file_offset = offsetof(struct mem_cgroup, events_file),
> --
> 2.11.0
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists