linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: fix unregister GISC when KVM is already gone results in OOPS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200921112318.0d11a2e5.cohuck@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 11:23:18 +0200
From:   Cornelia Huck <cohuck@...hat.com>
To:     Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, pmorel@...ux.ibm.com, pasic@...ux.ibm.com,
        alex.williamson@...hat.com, kwankhede@...dia.com,
        borntraeger@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/vfio-ap: fix unregister GISC when KVM is already
 gone results in OOPS

On Fri, 18 Sep 2020 13:02:34 -0400
Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:

> Attempting to unregister Guest Interruption Subclass (GISC) when the
> link between the matrix mdev and KVM has been removed results in the
> following:
> 
>    "Kernel panic -not syncing: Fatal exception: panic_on_oops"

I'm wondering how we get there (why are we unregistering the gisc if
the mdev and kvm are not yet linked or are already unlinked?), so I
agree that the actual backchain would be helpful here.

> 
> This patch fixes this bug by verifying the matrix mdev and KVM are still
> linked prior to unregistering the GISC.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tony Krowiak <akrowiak@...ux.ibm.com>
> ---
>  drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c | 14 +++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> index e0bde8518745..847a88642644 100644
> --- a/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/s390/crypto/vfio_ap_ops.c
> @@ -119,11 +119,15 @@ static void vfio_ap_wait_for_irqclear(int apqn)
>   */
>  static void vfio_ap_free_aqic_resources(struct vfio_ap_queue *q)
>  {
> -	if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev)

If checking for ->kvm is the right thing to do, I agree that moving the
check here would be easier to read.

> -		kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm, q->saved_isc);
> -	if (q->saved_pfn && q->matrix_mdev)
> -		vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> -				 &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> +	if (q->matrix_mdev) {
> +		if (q->saved_isc != VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID && q->matrix_mdev->kvm)
> +			kvm_s390_gisc_unregister(q->matrix_mdev->kvm,
> +						 q->saved_isc);
> +		if (q->saved_pfn)
> +			vfio_unpin_pages(mdev_dev(q->matrix_mdev->mdev),
> +					 &q->saved_pfn, 1);
> +	}
> +
>  	q->saved_pfn = 0;
>  	q->saved_isc = VFIO_AP_ISC_INVALID;
>  }