[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921111257.GF3950626@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:12:57 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/34] i2c: tegra: Use clk-bulk helpers
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:01:56PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
> It's still possible to add the clk-num checking, but it should be
> unpractical. We could always add it later on if there will be a real
> incident. Do you agree?
There's also clk_bulk_get(), which allows you to specify the number of
clocks and their consumer IDs that you want to request. That seems like
it would allow us to both avoid the repetitive calls to clk APIs and at
the same time allows us to specify exactly which clocks we need. Would
that not work as a compromise?
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists