lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921111257.GF3950626@ulmo>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:12:57 +0200
From:   Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:     Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc:     Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
        Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
        Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
        Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
        Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
        linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 12/34] i2c: tegra: Use clk-bulk helpers

On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:01:56PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
[...]
> It's still possible to add the clk-num checking, but it should be
> unpractical. We could always add it later on if there will be a real
> incident. Do you agree?

There's also clk_bulk_get(), which allows you to specify the number of
clocks and their consumer IDs that you want to request. That seems like
it would allow us to both avoid the repetitive calls to clk APIs and at
the same time allows us to specify exactly which clocks we need. Would
that not work as a compromise?

Thierry

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ