[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921114403.GO3950626@ulmo>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 13:44:03 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@...e.qmqm.pl>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 32/34] i2c: tegra: Clean up and improve comments
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 01:43:20PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 06:17:39PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> > 17.09.2020 18:02, Dmitry Osipenko пишет:
> > > 17.09.2020 15:32, Thierry Reding пишет:
> > > ...
> > >>> /**
> > >>> - * struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature : Different HW support on Tegra
> > >>> - * @has_continue_xfer_support: Continue transfer supports.
> > >>> + * struct tegra_i2c_hw_feature : per hardware generation features
> > >>
> > >> I think that space before ':' can go away. Although that's preexisting,
> > >> so could also be a separate patch, I guess.
> > >
> > > I haven't even noticed that!
> > >
> >
> > Wait, that ':' is used only for the struct description, hence it
> > actually looks natural in the code.
>
> What makes the struct description different from the field descriptions?
> A description list is basically:
>
> <term>: <description>
>
> And it doesn't matter what exactly <term> is.
Anyway, like I said, this is preexisting, so we can always fix that up
in another patch:
Reviewed-by: Thierry Reding <treding@...dia.com>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists