linux-kernel - [PATCH V3 2/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Enable MEM

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1600689908-28213-3-git-send-email-anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Date:   Mon, 21 Sep 2020 17:35:07 +0530
From:   Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
To:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc:     catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
        Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH V3 2/3] arm64/mm/hotplug: Enable MEM_OFFLINE event handling

This enables MEM_OFFLINE memory event handling. It will help intercept any
possible error condition such as if boot memory some how still got offlined
even after an explicit notifier failure, potentially by a future change in
generic hot plug framework. This would help detect such scenarios and help
debug further.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
Cc: Steve Capper <steve.capper@....com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
---
 arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index df3b7415b128..6b171bd88bcf 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -1482,13 +1482,40 @@ static int prevent_bootmem_remove_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
 	unsigned long end_pfn = arg->start_pfn + arg->nr_pages;
 	unsigned long pfn = arg->start_pfn;
 
-	if (action != MEM_GOING_OFFLINE)
+	if ((action != MEM_GOING_OFFLINE) && (action != MEM_OFFLINE))
 		return NOTIFY_OK;
 
-	for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
-		ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
-		if (early_section(ms))
-			return NOTIFY_BAD;
+	if (action == MEM_GOING_OFFLINE) {
+		for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
+			ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
+			if (early_section(ms)) {
+				pr_warn("Boot memory offlining attempted\n");
+				return NOTIFY_BAD;
+			}
+		}
+	} else if (action == MEM_OFFLINE) {
+		for (; pfn < end_pfn; pfn += PAGES_PER_SECTION) {
+			ms = __pfn_to_section(pfn);
+			if (early_section(ms)) {
+
+				/*
+				 * This should have never happened. Boot memory
+				 * offlining should have been prevented by this
+				 * very notifier. Probably some memory removal
+				 * procedure might have changed which would then
+				 * require further debug.
+				 */
+				pr_err("Boot memory offlined\n");
+
+				/*
+				 * Core memory hotplug does not process a return
+				 * code from the notifier for MEM_OFFLINE event.
+				 * Error condition has been reported. Report as
+				 * ignored.
+				 */
+				return NOTIFY_DONE;
+			}
+		}
 	}
 	return NOTIFY_OK;
 }
-- 
2.20.1