[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200921141456.GD24515@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2020 15:14:56 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"io-uring@...r.kernel.org" <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9 next] fs/io_uring Don't use the return value from
import_iovec().
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 02:55:20PM +0000, David Laight wrote:
>
> This is the only code that relies on import_iovec() returning
> iter.count on success.
> This allows a better interface to import_iovec().
This looks generall sane, but a comment below:
> @@ -3123,7 +3123,7 @@ static int io_read(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> iov_count = iov_iter_count(iter);
> - io_size = ret;
> + io_size = iov_count;
> req->result = io_size;
> ret = 0;
>
> @@ -3246,7 +3246,7 @@ static int io_write(struct io_kiocb *req, bool force_nonblock,
> if (ret < 0)
> return ret;
> iov_count = iov_iter_count(iter);
> - io_size = ret;
> + io_size = iov_count;
> req->result = io_size;
I tink the local iov_count variable can go away in both functions,
as io_size only changes after the last use of iov_count (io_read) or
not at all (io_write).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists