[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200922122200.149d8e96@lwn.net>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:22:00 -0600
From: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
To: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Francesco Ruggeri <fruggeri@...sta.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Taehee Yoo <ap420073@...il.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Fix Kernel-doc warnings introduced on next-20200921
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 20:52:06 +0300
Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> Mea culpa. My doc test build was foiled by the sphinx 2 vs. 3
> regression and I was too lazy to start downgrading things.
> Any ETA for getting that fixed btw?
There's a fix of sorts in docs-next (and thus linux-next) now, has been
there for a few weeks. Really fixing that problem properly requires more
time than anybody seems to have at the moment.
jon
Powered by blists - more mailing lists