linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8150

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <160080149549.310579.17453759593211612997@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:04:55 -0700
From:   Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To:     Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] clk: qcom: Add display clock controller driver for SM8150

Quoting Jonathan Marek (2020-09-11 08:34:06)
> Add support for the display clock controller found on SM8150
> based devices. This would allow display drivers to probe and
> control their clocks.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek <jonathan@...ek.ca>
> ---
>  drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig         |    9 +
>  drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile        |    1 +
>  drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8150.c | 1152 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 1162 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/dispcc-sm8150.c

If the bindings are the same for these two drivers I wonder if there is
anything different between the two. Maybe the two drivers can be one
driver?