[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <15cc1edce12357799ae3caea3b89a3aad3a3bd07.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:44:35 -0700
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/1] Add explicit error for missing CONFIG_ASN1
On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 12:38 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 9/22/20 12:19 PM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > On Tue, 2020-09-22 at 11:54 -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > On 9/22/20 8:53 AM, James Bottomley wrote:
> > > > I recently ran into this as an error from 0day. On x86 it's
> > > > pretty
> > > > much impossible to build a configuration where CONFIG_ASN1
> > > > isn't
> > > > set, so you rarely notice a problem using the ASN.1 compiler
> > > > because something else has selected it. However, this compiler
> > > > is
> > > > never built if CONFIG_ASN1 isn't set and the error you get from
> > > > kbuild is particularly unhelpful:
> > > >
> > > > make[4]: *** No rule to make target 'security/keys/trusted-
> > > > keys/tpm2key.asn1.o', needed by 'security/keys/trusted-
> > > > keys/built-
> > > > in.a'.
> > > > make[4]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:283:
> > > > security/keys/trusted-
> > > > keys/trusted_tpm2.o] Error 1
> > > > make[4]: Target '__build' not remade because of errors.
> > > >
> > > > This patch changes the above error to the much easier to
> > > > diagnose:
> > > >
> > > > scripts/Makefile.build:387: *** CONFIG_ASN1 must be defined
> > > > for
> > > > the asn1_compiler. Stop.
> > > > make[3]: *** [scripts/Makefile.build:505:
> > > > security/keys/trusted-
> > > > keys] Error 2
> > > >
> > > > James
> > > >
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > James Bottomley (1):
> > > > Makefile.build: Add an explicit error for missing ASN.1
> > > > compiler
> > > >
> > > > scripts/Makefile.build | 5 +++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > Is there a missing
> > > select ASN1
> > > somewhere?
> >
> > You mean in the build used to produce the errors above? Yes, so
> > the
> > patch is to make the problem more explicit.
>
> I appreciate that the message can be improved, but it seems possible
> that some Kconfig could also be improved.
I don't really see how. To find the problem you have to identify a
conditional build in the Makefile that requires the asn1 compiler but
for which the config option doesn't have a select ASN1. We don't
currently preserve the "what selected this symbol" information in
kconfig, which is what we'd need.
James
Powered by blists - more mailing lists