[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <160080522837.310579.7160115709529621594@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 13:07:08 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>
To: Amit Sunil Dhamne <amit.sunil.dhamne@...inx.com>,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, m.tretter@...gutronix.de,
mark.rutland@....com, michal.simek@...inx.com,
mturquette@...libre.com
Cc: rajanv@...inx.com, jollys@...inx.com, tejasp@...inx.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Amit Sunil Dhamne <amit.sunil.dhamne@...inx.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] clk: zynqmp: Add firmware specific clock flags
Quoting Amit Sunil Dhamne (2020-09-09 13:44:45)
> Currently firmware is maintaining CCF specific flags and provides to
> CCF as it is. But CCF flag numbers may change and that shouldn't mean
> that the firmware needs to change. The firmware should have its own
> 'flag number space' that is distinct from the common clk framework's
> 'flag number space'. So use firmware specific clock flags in ZynqMP
> clock driver instead of CCF flags.
>
> Changes in v4:
> - Use if condition instead of ternary operator.
>
Thanks. This patch series doesn't apply for me though. What is the base
of the patches? Can you use the --base option when formatting patches
with git format-patch? That would help me.
Also, I think your MUA or SMTP server is mangling the format. I had
trouble trying to apply the patches from my local copy so I had to
fallback to lore but even that didn't work.
Please resend.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists