lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 22 Sep 2020 10:32:21 +0800
From:   miaoqinglang <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
To:     Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
        David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
CC:     <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] drm: omapdrm: dss: simplify the return expression
 of hdmi_init_pll_data



在 2020/9/21 21:39, Tomi Valkeinen 写道:
> Hi,
> 
> On 21/09/2020 16:10, Qinglang Miao wrote:
>> Simplify the return expression.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Qinglang Miao <miaoqinglang@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi_pll.c | 7 +------
>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi_pll.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi_pll.c
>> index cf2b000f3..c3e85b636 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi_pll.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/dss/hdmi_pll.c
>> @@ -131,7 +131,6 @@ static int hdmi_init_pll_data(struct dss_device *dss,
>>   {
>>   	struct dss_pll *pll = &hpll->pll;
>>   	struct clk *clk;
>> -	int r;
>>   
>>   	clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "sys_clk");
>>   	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
>> @@ -151,11 +150,7 @@ static int hdmi_init_pll_data(struct dss_device *dss,
>>   
>>   	pll->ops = &hdmi_pll_ops;
>>   
>> -	r = dss_pll_register(dss, pll);
>> -	if (r)
>> -		return r;
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>> +	return dss_pll_register(dss, pll);
>>   }
>>   
>>   int hdmi_pll_init(struct dss_device *dss, struct platform_device *pdev,
>>
> 
> I like it more when there's a return 0 at the end of the function, especially in functions where
> there are multiple cases of if(...) return r. It's more easily readable, at least to my eyes.
> 
>   Tomi

Hi Tomi,

Glad to know your opnion and it sounds fine to me.

Thanks

> 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ